The Natural Resources Board voted Thursday to make changes to antlerless deer quotas in four northern Wisconsin counties as part of a special board meeting. The meeting was held to reconsider the board's vote last month after allegations it violated open meetings laws.

The board voted 5-2 on June 24 to reduce antlerless quotas or public land permits in 11 northern Wisconsin counties. The decision brought down the number of deer that can be harvested by about 4,600 across the 11 counties.

On Thursday, the board voted 6-1 to revert to quota recommendations that were put forth by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for Douglas, Bayfield, Burnett and Sawyer counties. The board's previous decision on the remaining seven counties will stand.

The June 24 vote upset many of the northern County Deer Advisory Council chairs, while several supported the change.

Al Horvath, chair of the Douglas County council, said the group worked out a compromise on the deer harvest while being mindful of public input.

"I was shocked to learn that the hard work and dedication of the Douglas County council was ignored when the Natural Resources Board set their antlerless quota," Horvath said.

Bayfield County Deer Advisory Council Chair Kevin Schanning said they based their quotas on a variety of factors, including deer data and the makeup of land in the county. The county is heavily forested, and timber sales are an important source of revenue there.

"We are strongly opposed to vague generalizations and individual opinions overriding the scientific deer metrics and the public opinion that we base our decisions on," he said.

However, others felt the board acted professionally in making its decision, including Marathon County Deer Advisory Council member Mike Brust. He urged the committee to consider hunter interests to grow the deer herd, which he said are often ignored.

"Not all CDAC members oppose the action by the board," Brust said. The reality is that many CDACs are strongly influenced by or controlled by interests that would like to see fewer deer on the landscape, often including a DNR representative. Representing hunters' interests are sometimes in the minority despite overwhelming public testimony in many cases to restore the deer herd in their county."

Tony Blattler, vice chair for the Wisconsin Conservation Congress, reiterated the group's support for the recommendations that were set by the Deer Advisory Council chairs. He acknowledged that the councils serve in an advisory capacity to the board, but he feared the public may lose faith in the deer advisory councils if they feel their voices aren't being heard.

Board members said in June that a slight reduction in tags is necessary to prevent harvesting too many deer on public lands. Greg Kazmierski, the board's vice chair, was the sole board member to oppose any changes to that decision. He reiterated that the recommendations he put forward in June regarding the 11 counties were based on deer population trends and overwhelming public input to grow the deer herd.

"This year we had the most participation ever in those CDACs, and what we are doing right now is thumbing our nose to those that participated in the process," Kazmierski said.

Fred Prehn, the board's chairman, said there needs to be a larger conversation to define what the deer herd should look like in Wisconsin.

This month, three former board members wrote a letter to the board and filed a complaint against the body for its vote in June. They alleged four board members shared that plan to reduce quotas in those counties among themselves in a walking quorum, which would be a violation of the state's open meetings laws.

At the beginning of the meeting, Prehn said that the board has been grappling with sharing information with the public and board members as a result of working remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

"Historically, this board has operated in a transparent manner, and we are committed to maintaining that fact in the interest of transparency," Prehn said.

Dave Clausen is among former board members who submitted the complaint. He said he's pleased with the changes that the board made.

"I still think that they should have reversed their actions completely because I think what the other CDACs had to say and how they voted, it still shows a certain amount of lack of respect for the process," Clausen said.

The complaint has been filed with Dane County for review.

Officials may be subject to a fine of up to $300 per violation. State law allows a court to void any action taken in violation of the state's open meetings law.

Wisconsin Public Radio, Copyright 2020, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System and Wisconsin Educational Communications Board. Wisconsin Public Radio can be heard locally on 91.3 KUWS-FM and at