That was a horrible letter to the editor a few weeks ago from Ms. Schroeder, accusing us Democrats of being racists ("Democrats ignore their party's history," Sept. 20 Telegram).

As a lifelong Democrat, I whole-heartedly disagree with her little history lesson, but there is a bigger problem: She wrongly associates minorities with “welfare” that is, as she puts it, “making minorities enslaved."

We need to stop associating welfare benefits with minorities and minorities with welfare benefits. There never was a one-to-one relationship, and even less so now as the economy in predominantly-white rural areas has deteriorated and welfare benefits more important with each day.

On the minority side, there has been a big change in society as hardworking, talented African-American and other minorities have taken their rightful place in professions and middleclass jobs.

The change is most evident in big cities. We need to take a lesson from our adult kids who move away to enjoy opportunities in cities where diversity is a part of everyday life. They rub shoulders daily with people of many races, equal partners in society. They learn to appreciate people of different cultures. They come back on visits and find our racial biases outdated and uncomfortable.

The cultural strength of minority families should be evident too in small town Wisconsin. We have many non-white professionals, especially doctors. Latino families have put down family roots here for decades.

In Barron County, our newest and largest group of African-Americans, Somalis, are working hard, going to church, raising families and enjoying middle-class incomes. But non-white people are often treated around here like they are “on welfare," as Ms. Schroeder implies, and as a lot of white people wrongly suspect.

If our small towns are going to prosper, we need to appreciate the strength that a community gets from diversity. As described by promoters of economic development and “placemaking," vibrant, interesting communities that thrive on cultural and racial diversity are attractive places to live.

Finally, Ms. Schroeder’s letter attacks 1960s-era civil rights laws. Contrary to her claim, these laws have nothing to do with welfare and certainly didn’t “enslave” anyone.

These laws prohibited bias in voting, employment and housing. They provided legal support for the deeply American value that anyone with talent, a strong work ethic and maybe a little luck ought to be able to try to get ahead in this country, unimpeded by racial, gender or disability bias. Those laws are the reason why the larger society is now more diverse and egalitarian.

And that is something we Democrats celebrate!